| EV ID | EV-0050 |
|---|---|
| Title | Licence letters from BP Pension Trust and BP Properties to Mrs Buckler (Mrs Williams) |
| Date of document | 31 October 1974 |
| Type | letter |
| Evidence label | PRIMARY DOCUMENT — NOT PUBLISHED HERE |
| Repository / reference | Holder: described in the Court of Appeal judgment; Originals or family copies to be attached. Custodian/source copy: Buckler family evidence repository (bucklerfamily.estate). No reference numbers given. |
| Status | PENDING — Originals or family copies to be attached; Images awaited. Custodian: Buckler family evidence repository (bucklerfamily.estate). In Court of Appeal judgment (BP Properties Ltd v Buckler). |
| Provenance | , no image, scan or transcription is attached. Account comes from the Court of Appeal judgment (court record). |
| Wiki catalogue page | GHF-E136 |
| Claims that rely on this | BP Properties Ltd and BP Pension Trust — Forensic Assessment, Claim: Repeated attempts to frame Mary (Nancy) Williams’s Parcel A occupation as permiss, Court of Appeal — Forensic Assessment |
About this page type → Read the Docs
Proves: Not held, so nothing yet. Reported: court of Appeal judgment: two letters dated 31 October 1974 — sale agreement (BP Pension Trust) and licence offer (BP Properties) — held to make her possession permissive, though unaccepted.
Does not prove: Does not show whether Mary replied or the offer’s wording, since no copy is held; Nor why a licence followed her ownership plea (E135) weeks before conveyance (E138).
Relevance to the 29 October 2026 working theory. The 1974 letters are central to the legal characterisation of Mary's occupation; the 1987 Court of Appeal treated the correspondence as creating a licence, and that conclusion must be fairly represented. The working theory tests the sequence against her earlier plea, the 1962 order, the corporate title chain and subsequent registration papers. The letters alone do not prove fraud or that the separate title chain was invalid. Read the theory and tests.
