Lakeside and Llandough Development Company Ltd
Forensic assessment · v1.1.0 · updated 1 November 2026
Translation pending: the assessment text below is in English, the authoritative record.
- Response status
- No contact on file
- Last contact
- None on file
- Next date on file
- None on file
- Earlier version
- v1.0.0, published 21 October 2026 on the Legal Wiki
Since last assessment
14 October 2026 to 1 November 2026
Our reading: No new correspondence is on file since the last assessment. The earlier finding stands unchanged.
The assessment as last published
Carried over unchanged from v1.0.0 (21 October 2026). Links point inside this site.
Assessed 14 October 2026. Scope: documented appearance in one conveyance. The company is a historic entity. Inclusion is not a finding of fault.
Documented appearances
| Date | Appearance | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 11 June 1965 | Party (1) to a conveyance and plan of land for Llandough Primary School, with Western Ground Rents Ltd (2) and Glamorgan County Council (3); consideration £16,800. The Vale of Glamorgan Council holds the conveyance and a 1965 contract. | Reply register R23 (FOI 00211027), 14 September 2026. The 27 MB email with both attachments is not yet retrieved. |
Current finding
As at 14 October 2026, the material reviewed does not establish wrongdoing by the company. Facts come from the Council’s covering email. The conveyance plan has not been read, so it is not known which land it covers or how it relates to the Great House Farm parcels.
Next step
Retrieve the 1965 conveyance, plan and contract and overlay the plan on the two-parcel map. The 14 September 2026 email’s attachment names are recorded under Vale FOI 00211027, Thread 8, but the PDFs themselves have not been retrieved into the Wiki media library and the deed/plan have not been read here. Ask the Vale to resend the conveyance/plan and contract as separate files or through a secure transfer link. The presence of WGR as a party is not, by itself, proof of how it originally acquired this or other land. Acceptance: the original deed and plan are preserved, transcribed and mapped against the two-parcel model, with the actual title recitals and limitations recorded. Also see New Archival Leads, section 8.3.
Related
Western Ground Rents review · Glamorgan County Council review · Vale of Glamorgan Council review
Created 14 October 2026. Prepared with AI assistance from the wiki’s existing records, on the family’s instruction. Corrections are welcome and will be dated here.
Change history is maintained on the Master Change Log; no separate page-local version footer is maintained.
Case file
This file is built for a future reparations claim. Facts are as the records show them; interpretation is labelled “our reading”. Items marked “not checked” have not been compared with the original record.
(a) Conduct timeline
0 dated interactions, oldest first; 0 automatic acknowledgements are left out. Quotations are verbatim from the institution’s email; where the reply’s substance was an attachment, the email subject is quoted instead.
Show the timeline
| Date | Direction | Reference | Type | Verbatim |
|---|
(b) Inconsistencies and gaps
None found in the correspondence on file.
(c) Quarantined-name links
Records on the quarantine register (Kissed Frogs) that sit in, or came from, this institution’s holdings. None is treated as settled.
No quarantined-name record on the register is linked to this institution’s holdings.
(d) Duty and liability — our reading
Liability indicators (our reading): none
- Duty
- No general statutory duty to disclose; UK GDPR Art. 15 for personal data it holds; duties in contract, conveyancing practice or professional rules where it was a party, agent or adviser; once on notice of a possible claim, an expectation to preserve relevant documents.
- Indicators the duty was not met
- none found in the correspondence on file.
- Evidence still needed to confirm
- the institution’s retention schedule and disposal record for the series in question; the catalogue or file list it searched; any internal review or complaint outcome.
- Likely extent of exposure if confirmed
- Depends on its role in a transaction: where it was a party or adviser to a dealing in the land, exposure follows that role; otherwise none beyond data-protection duties.
(e) Evidence still needed
- View any deposited papers (company or estate records) at the archive that holds them. for paid visit list
Versions
| 1.1.0 | 2026-11-01 | Moved to the Forensic Assessments webapp; dated “Since last assessment” section added; response status re-read. |
| 1.0.0 | 2026-10-21 | As published on the Legal Wiki. |