Church of England archives (Lambeth Palace Library)
Forensic assessment · v1.0.0 · updated 1 November 2026
Translation pending: the assessment text below is in English, the authoritative record.
- Response status
- Awaiting first reply
- Last contact
- 20 October 2026
- Next date on file
- None on file
- Earlier version
- Not yet assessed
Correspondence on file
since 1 September 2026
Our reading: Since September 2026, 2 emails are on file: 1 sent, 1 received (0 with content, 1 automatic acknowledgements). Most material: 20 October 2026, sent, request (ref ECE/6/3/372/CD27551): The requester asks for information on glebe, exchange and Bute Estate records relating to land at Llandough-juxta-Penarth, with six specific questions.
- Sentrequestref ECE/6/3/372/CD27551
The requester asks for information on glebe, exchange and Bute Estate records relating to land at Llandough-juxta-Penarth, with six specific questions.
1 automatic acknowledgement
An automated message confirms receipt of the enquiry and states a fuller response is expected within 10 working days.
Not yet assessed
No forensic assessment has been written for this body yet. This page logs the correspondence on file so the first assessment can start from the record.
Case file
This file is built for a future reparations claim. Facts are as the records show them; interpretation is labelled “our reading”. Items marked “not checked” have not been compared with the original record.
(a) Conduct timeline
1 dated interactions, oldest first; 1 automatic acknowledgements are left out. Quotations are verbatim from the institution’s email; where the reply’s substance was an attachment, the email subject is quoted instead.
Show the timeline
| Date | Direction | Reference | Type | Verbatim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 October 2026 | sent | ECE/6/3/372/CD27551 | request | Subject: Records request — Lambeth Palace Library / Church Commissioners: glebe, exchange and Bute Estate records, Llandough-juxta-Penarth (ECE/6/3/372/CD27551) |
(b) Inconsistencies and gaps
None found in the correspondence on file.
(c) Quarantined-name links
Records on the quarantine register (Kissed Frogs) that sit in, or came from, this institution’s holdings. None is treated as settled.
No quarantined-name record on the register is linked to this institution’s holdings.
(d) Duty and liability — our reading
Liability indicators (our reading): none
- Duty
- Custody and cataloguing of deposited records (Public Records Act 1958 for public records and places of deposit; the deposit terms for private collections); FOIA 2000 / EIR 2004 for information about holdings; an accurate catalogue is the finding aid the public relies on.
- Indicators the duty was not met
- none found in the correspondence on file.
- Evidence still needed to confirm
- the institution’s retention schedule and disposal record for the series in question; the catalogue or file list it searched; any internal review or complaint outcome.
- Likely extent of exposure if confirmed
- Limited to the custodial record unless a mis-catalogued or withheld item is shown to have kept evidence from a decision-maker; then it may extend to the cost of putting the record right.
(e) Evidence still needed
- View the original items and the accession / deposit file at the search room. for paid visit list
Versions
| 1.0.0 | 2026-11-01 | First page: correspondence log. |