GHF-E137 — 1974 H. J. Thomas architectural survey and floor plan (RCAHMW / National Monuments Record)
Wiki catalogue reference: GHF-E137 · Custodian / source URL: The Cedwyn evidence repository
Evidence preview
Preview not embedded. As at 10-10-2026, no inline image or document preview was identified in the evidence section of this page. Use the custodian/source link below to inspect the item.
1. The evidence
Evidence object area: scans of NMR 6048941, 6048943 and 6048945 are to be ordered under RCAHMW RC26-0375. Which reference is the survey and which is the Johns–Buckler correspondence is to be confirmed on receipt.
Catalogue UID: GHF-E137 · Custodian/source copy: bucklerfamily.estate. Preview and provenance status as at 10-10-2026.
Description
3. What is not known
2. What is known
Catalogue: GHF-E137 · Type: Architectural survey, floor plan and photographs · Date: 1974 · Holder: Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales (NMR) · Evidence status: PLACEHOLDER scans being ordered
DOCUMENTED FACT. RCAHMW holds the H. J. Thomas survey material, including a 1974 survey and floor plan documenting a sub-medieval or late-seventeenth-century building (RCAHMW review). RCAHMW says the house was only partly recorded because of problems created by an ownership dispute.
- The full wording and extent of the survey.
- The Johns–Buckler correspondence, lost “since 1986/87”, which may have recorded Mary’s own account of her title to an independent public body.
- Whether Cadw saw the survey in 1988.
Transcription
Open transcription
No verbatim transcription is included in this entry as at 10-10-2026. Where the source contains legible text, transcribe it faithfully and mark illegible or uncertain words rather than silently reconstructing them.
Interpretation and wider context
DOCUMENTED FACT / UNRESOLVED. It is a public record of the house’s significance fourteen years before demolition. 🕒
Relevance to the 29 October 2026 working theory. The 1974 architectural survey and floor plan can help identify the farmhouse, its layout and historic fabric present before demolition. It is relevant to physical identity and heritage history, but it is not a title instrument and cannot prove ownership, a false registration or coordination. Compare its measured footprint with historic maps and deeds only for the spatial questions those sources can answer. See the hypothesis and its tests.
Used on: ReOrg · Archaeology and Heritage
Interpretive assessment date: 10-10-2026.
Page version & change log
Current version: 1.0.0
| Version | Date (UTC) | Editor (human or agent name) | Change | Source / evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2026-10-18T15:33Z | Cedwyn editors | Footer standardised; earlier log rows carried into this table; no content change | Editing Protocol, 18 Oct 2026 |
| 2026-10-18 (rollout date; exact time not separately recorded) | OpenAI-assisted maintenance agent (GPT-6) | Installed this page-local append-only change log and agent instructions. Existing page content was not intentionally rewritten. | User-directed site-wide changelog standard. Saved via WordPress API; public rendering of this page not yet independently checked. |
Agents and editors: follow the Editing Protocol.