Hugh James / Loosemores (successors to John Loosemore & Co.)
Forensic assessment · v1.0.0 · updated 1 November 2026
Translation pending: the assessment text below is in English, the authoritative record.
- Response status
- Awaiting first reply
- Last contact
- 31 October 2026
- Next date on file
- None on file
- Earlier version
- Not yet assessed
Correspondence on file
since 1 September 2026
Our reading: Since September 2026, 2 emails are on file: 2 sent, 0 received (0 with content, 0 automatic acknowledgements). Most material: 31 October 2026, sent, preservation notice: Preservation and custody enquiry about the 1986–87 appellant's file in BP Properties Ltd v Buckler.
- Sentfollow-up
Follow-up to an enquiry and preservation request of 26 May 2026, asking to identify and examine three title records.
- Sentpreservation notice
Preservation and custody enquiry about the 1986–87 appellant's file in BP Properties Ltd v Buckler.
Not yet assessed
No forensic assessment has been written for this body yet. This page logs the correspondence on file so the first assessment can start from the record.
Case file
This file is built for a future reparations claim. Facts are as the records show them; interpretation is labelled “our reading”. Items marked “not checked” have not been compared with the original record.
(a) Conduct timeline
2 dated interactions, oldest first; 0 automatic acknowledgements are left out. Quotations are verbatim from the institution’s email; where the reply’s substance was an attachment, the email subject is quoted instead.
Show the timeline
| Date | Direction | Reference | Type | Verbatim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 October 2026 | sent | — | follow-up | Subject: Great House Farm, Llandough |
| 31 October 2026 | sent | — | preservation notice | Subject: Preservation and custody enquiry: 1986-87 appellant's file, BP Properties Ltd v Buckler (Loosemores, now Hugh James) |
(b) Inconsistencies and gaps
None found in the correspondence on file.
(c) Quarantined-name links
Records on the quarantine register (Kissed Frogs) that sit in, or came from, this institution’s holdings. None is treated as settled.
No quarantined-name record on the register is linked to this institution’s holdings.
(d) Duty and liability — our reading
Liability indicators (our reading): none
- Duty
- No general statutory duty to disclose; UK GDPR Art. 15 for personal data it holds; duties in contract, conveyancing practice or professional rules where it was a party, agent or adviser; once on notice of a possible claim, an expectation to preserve relevant documents.
- Indicators the duty was not met
- none found in the correspondence on file.
- Evidence still needed to confirm
- the institution’s retention schedule and disposal record for the series in question; the catalogue or file list it searched; any internal review or complaint outcome.
- Likely extent of exposure if confirmed
- Depends on its role in a transaction: where it was a party or adviser to a dealing in the land, exposure follows that role; otherwise none beyond data-protection duties.
(e) Evidence still needed
- View any deposited papers (company or estate records) at the archive that holds them. for paid visit list
Versions
| 1.0.0 | 2026-11-01 | First page: correspondence log. |