39 of 59

Forensic Assessments

Media Wales / Reach plc (South Wales Echo, Western Mail)

Forensic assessment · v1.1.0 · updated 1 November 2026

Response status
No contact on file
Last contact
None on file
Next date on file
None on file
Earlier version
v1.0.0, published 21 October 2026 on the Legal Wiki

Since last assessment

14 October 2026 to 1 November 2026

Our reading: No new correspondence is on file since the last assessment. The earlier finding stands unchanged.

The assessment as last published

Carried over unchanged from v1.0.0 (21 October 2026). Links point inside this site.

Page ID: 3109 · Title: Media Wales / Reach plc (South Wales Echo, Western Mail) — Forensic Assessment · Evidence status: Not yet labelled — see the Editing Protocol · Version: 1.0.0 · Editing Protocol

Assessed 14 October 2026. Scope: newspaper publisher and archive functions only. Newspaper reports are evidence of what was reported, not automatic proof of every reported detail. Inclusion is not a finding of fault.

Documented appearances

DateAppearanceSource
29–30 April 1988Reports of the first eviction attempt, including police presence.GHF-E168; GHF-E090-N07
3 December 1988South Wales Echo, “History fight to save farm and demolition report”.GHF-E172
6 December 1988Western Mail, “Farmer fails in final eviction hearing”.Western Mail, 6 December 1988
20 March 1989South Wales Echo search extract.GHF-E090-N15-14
August–September 2026The family’s archive enquiry to a Reach plc contact about South Wales Echo coverage (1990) and related matters: an out-of-office reply on 20 August; a family follow-up on 2 September.Family correspondence

Current finding

As at 14 October 2026, the material reviewed does not establish wrongdoing by the publisher. The 2026 enquiry has had an out-of-office reply only; no substantive response is recorded. The 1988–89 articles are used for what they say was reported.

Next step

Ask Reach plc / Media Wales for the original page images, dates and photographers’ credits for the 1988 items, and whether any photograph archive survives. Acceptance: each article has a verified date and page reference, or a dated negative archive result.

Related

Press Archive — Newspaper Transcripts · Media Gallery · ITV Cymru Wales review

Created 14 October 2026. Prepared with AI assistance from the wiki’s existing records, on the family’s instruction. Corrections are welcome and will be dated here.

Change history is maintained on the Master Change Log; no separate page-local version footer is maintained.

Case file

This file is built for a future reparations claim. Facts are as the records show them; interpretation is labelled “our reading”. Items marked “not checked” have not been compared with the original record.

(a) Conduct timeline

0 dated interactions, oldest first; 0 automatic acknowledgements are left out. Quotations are verbatim from the institution’s email; where the reply’s substance was an attachment, the email subject is quoted instead.

Show the timeline
DateDirectionReferenceTypeVerbatim

(b) Inconsistencies and gaps

None found in the correspondence on file.

(c) Quarantined-name links

Records on the quarantine register (Kissed Frogs) that sit in, or came from, this institution’s holdings. None is treated as settled.

No quarantined-name record on the register is linked to this institution’s holdings.

(d) Duty and liability — our reading

Liability indicators (our reading): none

Duty
No general statutory duty to disclose; UK GDPR Art. 15 for personal data it holds; duties in contract, conveyancing practice or professional rules where it was a party, agent or adviser; once on notice of a possible claim, an expectation to preserve relevant documents.
Indicators the duty was not met
none found in the correspondence on file.
Evidence still needed to confirm
the institution’s retention schedule and disposal record for the series in question; the catalogue or file list it searched; any internal review or complaint outcome.
Likely extent of exposure if confirmed
Depends on its role in a transaction: where it was a party or adviser to a dealing in the land, exposure follows that role; otherwise none beyond data-protection duties.

(e) Evidence still needed

Versions

1.1.02026-11-01Moved to the Forensic Assessments webapp; dated “Since last assessment” section added; response status re-read.
1.0.02026-10-21As published on the Legal Wiki.

Small print: dotted links explain a word (see the glossary); amber-shaded links list every name the records use for the same thing.